Your L&D Governance: Policing or Pleasing?

11:42:00 Learning Boffins 0 Comments


We need governance for our L&D. In large organisations it becomes essential to have a method of prioritisation for learning interventions. Is that true? Couldn’t we just let departments ‘spend to the end’ and then sit crying when the budget runs out just before the next ‘absolutely must have training’ crisis. That would be (somewhat) unfair to the business and we know that those charismatic people in your Sales department will spend faster than any other department, wouldn’t they!

So how is your governance structured? With your unique bird’s-eye view of the organisation you should be in prime position to help move the operations requests for learning  from concept to reality with speed and efficiency; but what is your reality? Are you still working on a first come first served basis or are you prioritising based on the capability of your internal delivery team? Are there ‘back doors’ to your process that allow certain teams or departments to fast track their requests for training?

There should be nothing subjective about the decisions for developing our people in the best way to equip them to support the strategic objectives. With tight budgets we have to make ‘tight’ decisions. These decisions should be transparent to the whole of your organisation and the process required should be easy to navigate.

What are the functions of the people who are part of the governance structure, if you have set up a Learning Council are they sure of what their purpose is? It can’t be effective if the strategy makers are not involved but if they are……do they make it like a policing exercise taking advantage of the privilege to peer into other departments thinking and reacting inappropriately?

What we know at KnowledgePool is it isn’t easy to establish the structure or process but with help and support it will become the backbone of your Learning and Development department.




Rachel Kuftinoff
Strategic Learning Consultant

You Might Also Like

0 comments: